chiasm, as explored by maurice merleau-ponty.
discursus, as explored by roland barthes.
(rather than discussion and debate, or monologue (Ich-Es), i am exploring an intertwining of argumentation, discourse- overlap in meanings, communication, words- weaving of thoughts, writing, dialogue (Ich-Du), etc.)

Friday, August 15, 2008

Interpretations.

we will, i will, we shall, dive into the wreck of the world caused and crowded upon nothing but our own mistakes and misfortunes and reasons and interpretations. we will, i will, we shall, take it upon ourselves to hold these findings in our palms and rest them then upon our hearts.
this is all... i shall, will, say... willed and ready to dive

Adrienne Rich
Diving into the Wreck

First having read the book of myths,
and loaded the camera,
and checked the edge of the knife-blade,
I put on
the body-armor of black rubber
the absurd flippers
the grave and awkward mask.
I am having to do this
not like Cousteau with his
assiduous team
aboard the sun-flooded schooner
but here alone.

There is a ladder.
The ladder is always there
hanging innocently
close to the side of the schooner.
We know what it is for,
we who have used it.
Otherwise
it is a piece of maritime floss
some sundry equipment.

I go down.
Rung after rung and still
the oxygen immerses me
the blue light
the clear atoms
of our human air.
I go down.
My flippers cripple me,
I crawl like an insect down the ladder
and there is no one
to tell me when the ocean
will begin.

First the air is blue and then
it is bluer and then green and then
black I am blacking out and yet
my mask is powerful
it pumps my blood with power
the sea is another story
the sea is not a question of power
I have to learn alone
to turn my body without force
in the deep element.

And now: it is easy to forget
what I came for
among so many who have always
lived here
swaying their crenellated fans
between the reefs
and besides
you breathe differently down here.

I came to explore the wreck.
The words are purposes.
The words are maps.
I came to see the damage that was done
and the treasures that prevail.
I stroke the beam of my lamp
slowly along the flank
of something more permanent
than fish or weed

the thing I came for:
the wreck and not the story of the wreck
the thing itself and not the myth
the drowned face always staring
toward the sun
the evidence of damage
worn by salt and away into this threadbare beauty
the ribs of the disaster
curving their assertion
among the tentative haunters.

This is the place.
And I am here, the mermaid whose dark hair
streams black, the merman in his armored body.
We circle silently
about the wreck
we dive into the hold.
I am she: I am he

whose drowned face sleeps with open eyes
whose breasts still bear the stress
whose silver, copper, vermeil cargo lies
obscurely inside barrels
half-wedged and left to rot
we are the half-destroyed instruments
that once held to a course
the water-eaten log
the fouled compass

We are, I am, you are
by cowardice or courage
the one who find our way
back to this scene
carrying a knife, a camera
a book of myths
in which
our names do not appear.



interpretations. make. or break. or matter. or not.
read. re-read. do. un-do.


the speaker, made androgynous in diving gear, goes underwater to hunt
"the wreck and not the story of the wreck / the thing itself and not the myth",
and identifies with those drowned and silenced as much as the diver who
finds them and can, must, report back to the world above.
poetryarchive
Added by: Connor
Crazy piece about how men and women are both casualties
of a confused sexuality. It's about viewing the corpse objectively,
as neither a man nor a woman (the corpse, also is androgenous)
and dispelling old myths. Cool stuff.

Added by: kevin
This poem is really about an individual finding themselves. The
entire metaphor is the diver and the ship wreck. A person protects
themselves before seeking their self-discovery with all of the diving
gear because of the unknown. A person will always discover a
"wreck" in their past but most look past that for the treasures that
have been buried away. The last couple stanzas speak of how we are
all together in this feat of self-discovery and we must always seek our
past and ourselves in ORDER to create our future.

Feminism
2003-04-18
Added by: SFitz
Rich was a Civil Rights and anti-war activist in the 60s.
She consistently intertwines politics and poetry. This poem
was written in 1973, and is about the feminist struggle. She
is alone in this journey to the depths of the earth, to a place
pre-civilization, yet she has the comfort of knowing others
before her have taken the same journey. It is a journey that
must be taken alone, although in much of Rich's writing she
refers to a group of people, or even society as a whole, as one.
The wreck is the damage that has been done over hundreds,
thousands of years that has led to the oppression or at least
the inequality of women, and a patriarchal society. Her book
of myths are the falsities instilled in the minds of those in
Western society, including gender roles, which she disspells
when she incorporates both man and woman into her body.
The book of myths ("in which our names do not appear")
may also be the Bible, seeing as how women are portrayed as
the root of sin and men as our Lord and saviors. Main idea
of the poem: "I came to explore the wreck... the damage that
was done and the treasures that prevail...I am she: I am he."
Basically, to achieve an ideal world, one would have to travel
backward to a time before humans existed (since gender roles
began in theory with Adam and Eve the creator of sin) and we
would have to start EVERYTHING over from scratch- "And
besides/ you breathe differently down here." We would have
to create a society minus gender roles and become one people-
"the one who find our way back to this scene."

universal poem
2004-01-21
Added by: JDog
I strongly disagree with SFitz's comments on Feminism.
Though it was true that Adrienne was a strong fighter for
women's rights, I believe she was aiming for a more universal
idea. The line "we circle silently about the wreck" depicts that
the character has not gone to change anything, but to solely
observe "the evidence of the damage". The person can't change
what has already been done, and may only "stroke the beam of
my lamp slowly along the flank". This dive is not to ridicule or
change, but mainly to explore and gain knowledge.
a thought on the necessity of writing in the first

2004-05-09
Added by: neil mulligan
Rich has written this poem in the first person and as an extended
metaphor for several reasons. Firstly, and act like a dive is a very
personal and individual experience which can be very challenging
and scary. This is why Rich’s quest into the patriarchal world of
fifties and sixties America is represented so adequately by the
metaphor. Also she is writing this poem as part of the feminist
movement, and there are sure to be thousands of other women
wishing to follow in her footsteps. For this reason I think it is
important that she be writing in the first person as if to say that
this is what I have done, and even though, as the metaphor
suggests, it was not easy, so can you the reader. Right from the
start of this poem, Rich talks about reading the book of myths which
I think alludes to the patriarchal state of America, she has first read
this book (or worried about the reality of the male orientated world)
and then prepared to get her diving gear on and go and see if the
wreck matches up the myth (or go into the real world as a feminist
to see what difference she can make or treasure she can find). The
conclusion of the poem therefore talks of finding a way back to the
wreckage carrying that same book of myths, only this time ‘our
names do not appear’. The significance of this line is that having
engaged on this personal conquest, the myth of the male orientated
world no longer applies to her, and all those who read with her and
‘dived’ with her. The myth has been quashed by the symbolic and
brave actions of ‘rolling up of sleeves’ and getting in there and
fighting for equality. First person in this poem is the most apt style
to write such a propaganda-based poem. The most essential idea I
believe that Adrienne Rich needed to get across was that I have
done it and now so can you. This could only be achieved by writing
in the first person. thanks you guys at plagiarist.com i have benefited
from you greatly.

2004-10-25
Added by: Amanda
The first line of the poem reveals a book of myths. I believe the book she
carries contains the societal myths that separate men and women. She
also carries a knife to maybe cut away the past and a camera to record
the new one she hopes to discover. She dives into the wreck, the mess this
battle of the sexes created, hoping to write new myths, of love and passion
in order to heal humanity. Also, she dives to discover maybe the truth
behind these myths. I think Adrienne is the speaker of this piece, and she
is gearing up to redefine the roles of men and women and to look beyond
gender. She’s alone in this piece, signifying that maybe sometimes she
feels alone in her fight towards equality for women in a male dominated
world.
When she gets down there she finds a corpse that is also treasure. Line 83
I think refers to her and maybe all women. She sees a piece of herself in
the corpse, herself as a dominated woman under the “curse” of a patriarchal
world. I think what the speaker intends to say that she is surviving this wreck.
Lines 34-36 and 50-51 give me the feeling that maybe she is in a daze or
blacking out, but still holds some kind of control. I’ve been diving before
and it is sort of a surreal world down there, even ways we would move or
even communicate are different. The power her mask contains is symbolic,
as it pumps her full of power while she is diving.
2005-05-22
Added by: Jaysto'

No comments: